"The Rise of Global Imperialism"

Absolute power is never shared. Throughout all of human history, the most enduring governments were not democracies, but monarchies and empires, where there was only one king, one emperor, one Lord, and everyone else was subject to his dominion, his power. Even in this so-called democratic modern society, there is always the emergence of one strong leader, to whom everyone else feels compelled to subject themselves. Nevertheless, with the rise of the Information Age, the global economy, and continued progress towards a truly universal world currency, the harvest is ripe for the establishment of a modern-day global empire, where one world leader has absolute power over everyone else. Even with extremely exponential advances in culture, science and technology, the terrifying cataclysmic threats resulting from such advances have also created a global political climate in favor of unprecedented absolute power. The same phenomena that drove the "Pax Romana" at the height of the Ancient Roman Empire also drive today's modern world: people want peace and safety, and in the days of the Roman Emperors they had a lasting semblance of those things, with one strong leader holding the entire known world together. In the modern world, there exist extremely covert elements of power who are poised to exploit the aforementioned global political climate in order to establish a truly global empire, where all the world's territories, resources, businesses, corporations, sciences, technologies, information systems, militaries, governments, societies, and peoples are absolutely subject to one strong leader. The only thing currently standing in their way is the existence of a successful democracy known as the United States of America. Because America has become a shining beacon of democracy in the modern world, a successful testament of a government by and for the people, and an enduring legacy of civil rights, equal rights, and human rights, America's very existence is the mortal enemy of global imperialism. As such, in order for the covert elements of power, the global imperialists, to successfully achieve their goal, the shining beacon of democracy must be disgraced, humiliated, and ultimately extinguished, with even the very fable of America reduced to nothing more than a shameful proverb and a ridiculous byword.

The most heinous atrocities can take place under cover of absolute secrecy. It wasn't until the Allied Forces invaded Nazi Germany that the full, horrific magnitude of the Jewish Holocaust was completely revealed. Had there been no money-trail between the Watergate burglars and President Nixon's Administration, Nixon would have gotten away with thoroughly undermining the Democratic Party. It was even discovered that Nixon secretly recorded every last private conversation that took place in the White House. And more recently, textile manufacturers and fashion outlets in America were charged with utilizing foreign slave-labor to manufacture the goods, with some of the sweat-shops located right here in the United States. Add to this list the following. American government covertly invades all of civilian privacy with top-secret electronic surveillance that has been conducted since the 1940s. American government covertly experiments with venereal diseases on unwary African-American populations in the 1950s. American government conducts top-secret mind-control experiments, which have taken place since the 1950s. And strong evidence has surfaced, alleging that the attacks of September 11th, 2001 were covertly carried out by an unholy alliance between the Bush Administration and corporate oil in order to establish an overwhelming national climate in favor of invading Afghanistan and Iraq. The limitless possibilities of absolute secrecy are now quite painfully obvious, if not altogether hideous. If the American people were to ever truly find out exactly how much of the nation's wealth and property are owned by foreign, multinational, and global corporations, versus how little of the same wealth and property are actually owned by the nation herself, the outrage might just spark a second American Revolution. In absolute secrecy, the most powerful people can imagine the most diabolical things. And with decades of absolute secrecy, even centuries, global imperialists can craftily orchestrate the conquest of the world. It was argued that certain members of the Masonic Order, including President George Washington himself, may have actually been the forerunners of our modern-day global imperialists, and that the birth of America was merely a stepping-stone towards global domination. Evidence may have been found on the back of the U.S. One Dollar Bill, the front of which bearing Washington's face. To the left is a drawing of a pyramid, with the cap-stone replaced by an eye within a triangle. Around that pyramid is a Latin inscription that reads "Annuit Cœptis Novus Ordo Seclorum," which roughly means "[He] Approved [the] Undertaking [of the] New World Order." "Novus Ordo Seclorum" means "New World Order," and President George Herbert Walker Bush (also a Mason) used that very phrase in his speech announcing the first invasion of Iraq in 1991, also known as "Operation Desert Storm" and "The Persian Gulf War." In the 1980s, when the same George H. W. Bush was Vice President in Ronald Reagan's Presidency, Reagan laid the foundation for the foreign ownership of American businesses and property, which became a forerunner of the modern global economy. At the same time, American labor forces within the very nation herself were being replaced by cheap immigrant labor, which became a forerunner of job outsourcing and offshoring. While on the surface all of these actions appear to be the result of rampant corporate greed, political corruption, and a heinous conflict of interests, the real, covert reason is the intentional, methodical, patient dismantling of the American democracy. America is becoming a nation that no longer belongs to herself, and her people as a whole have so little wealth (and so few means for acquiring wealth) that they have absolutely no way to defend themselves. And although the aforementioned Masons have been named as the global imperialists, they are not. The true global imperialists, a very small handful of extremely powerful people, are a super-secret sub-group derived from many super-secret sub-groups, which in turn are derived form many other super-secret sub-groups, which in turn are derived from many secretive groups like the Masons, the Trilateral Council, the Bilderberg Group, or the Skull and Bones. In reality, the global imperialists have neither a concrete name nor a place for their group, and going after them would make as much sense as fighting alone against a gigantic hundred-meter-long multi-headed hydra that also happens to be invisible. Until the global empire is fully established, no one will ever reveal the true identities of the global imperialists with hard evidence. And if you find that evidence, they will make sure that you never publish it, ever.

The problem with most Americans is that they don't get the big picture. They don't realize that their very nation and democratic way of life have huge bullseye targets on their foreheads and chests. And those who pride themselves on political activism have absolutely no idea what true activism really involves. It has to be much more than merely amassing huge numbers of people in the streets for hours of vocal protest. In fact, the aforementioned global imperialists simply laugh at such ridiculous protests while continuing to destroy America. The root of the average American's nearsightedness is "the luxurious consumer mentality" he or she has been brainwashed with since birth. With this mentality, emphasis is placed upon selfishness, wealth, pleasure, luxury, lust, gratification, and outright greed. Elements such as integrity, virtue, respectfulness, intellect, education, discipline, responsibility, culture, history, and memory are completely overshadowed, if not altogether abandoned, by the same mentality. As long as the American mind is kept inundated with these emotional torrents of unbridled hedonism and selfish greed, the ability to defend American democracy will remain dismantled. As such, Americans need to treat the luxurious consumer mentality as though it were the most lethal poison ever created. Now don't get it twisted. There is nothing wrong with you having things. But there is something terribly wrong when those things have you. And because of the luxurious consumer mentality, most of today's Americans belong to their things instead of their things belonging to them. As such, a luxurious consumer is nothing more than a glorified slave, and slavery is the mortal enemy of any democracy. Once the American has successfully eliminated the luxurious consumer mentality and all of its debilitating influences, he or she will then have a clear view of all the cash-flows and pertinent laws threatening to completely wipe out the American democracy. He or she will then know exactly how to completely cut off those cash-flows, overturn those laws, and then build wealth and assets that actually support democracy. Just like talk is cheap, vocal protest is worthless without appropriately organized legal, political, and financial action on every possible level. If it means actively boycotting every product or service produced by businesses that are directly or indirectly responsible for job outsourcing, offshoring, foreign slave-labor, unfair trade practices, environmental pollution, and a blatant violation of human rights, then it must be done. If it means refusing to support any politician or impeaching any politician who directly or indirectly supports the aforementioned unscrupulous businesses, then it must be done. If it means overturning laws made by the aforementioned politicians, then it must be done. And if it means that the American people must actively found their own grassroots organizations, build their own businesses, raise their own politicians, and pass their own laws to protect and defend democracy, then it absolutely must be done. The American people absolutely must put their money where their mouth is. Otherwise, no matter how many protest rallies there are, democracy will still fall.

At the same time, another major obstacle the American people must overcome in their defense of democracy is fear, especially the fear of death. Benjamin Franklin once said, "They that can give up their essential liberties to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." As such, the American people must remain determined in their defense of democracy, regardless of how viciously the covert elements of global imperialism destroy American property or kill American lives. Americans must understand that, in all honesty, global imperialism has long since declared war against all forms of democracy. And wars involve bloodshed. If the American is not ready to die for democracy, then he or she will never be ready to live for democracy. And although there may not ever be any damages, injuries, or deaths among the American people, they still need to defend democracy as though there will be. In a world of mortals, true Americans must always choose to die on their feet, never on their knees. Benjamin Franklin and the other founding fathers knew this all too well.

But even if Americans know what must be done to defend democracy against covert global imperialists who occupy high offices of power, will those Americans do it? Given that the majority of Americans spent eight long years sheepishly allowing George W. Bush and Richard Cheney to wreck the economy, make their nation the number-one polluter with regards to global warming, strip the common man of all human rights, turn the word "patriot" into a McCarthy-Era guillotine, and terrorize the nation into fighting two costly corporate oil-wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, what shape are the American people really in? And are the American people really in any shape to defend democracy at all? Merely electing a friendly new President, or a "getting down to the nitty-gritty" President, or a justice and reform President will not, in any way, stop the present onslaught of global imperialism. In fact, if the worst of disasters befalls this nation and brings to light that good President's humanity (or worse, his or her mortality), then the emerging supremacy of global imperialism will only be hastened. As stated earlier, people want peace and safety. And in a world where such peace and safety have grown increasingly scarce even in the most civilized societies, what will people willingly surrender in exchange for that peace and safety? Their dignity? Their essential liberties? Their human rights? Their democracy? Many Americans have already sold out to that extent during the 9/11 Bush Administration, and their fearful acquiescence has only proven that global imperialism is winning, and democracy is losing. And to those American cowards who foolishly believe that it's better to live on your knees than it is to die on your feet, what makes you think you're still alive? What good is it to go on breathing, eating, drinking, working, buying, selling, copulating, or doing anything else when you've lost your very soul? And how can any amount of wealth, or luxury, or property, or goods, or friendships, or sexual pleasure, or anything else in this world restore to you your very soul, your very dignity, integrity, and virtue? As stated earlier, if you are not ready to die for democracy, then you will never be ready to live for democracy. And as long as you continue to fearfully avoid this responsibility by drowning yourself in the lifestyle of the luxurious consumer mentality, then you are nothing more than a glorified slave, and as such, you are actually the mortal enemy of the very democracy you claim to defend (if you even claim to defend it at all). You will only reap what you sow. There are some who believe that democracy already died long ago, while others believe that it was nothing more than an elaborate lie since its very birth. Whatever the belief, advanced technology and the Information Age may have actually tightened the grip of mass conformity and totalitarian control upon the minds of the people rather than setting them free. As such, the stage is already set for global domination, as mentioned earlier.

From a religious standpoint, particularly that of the Christian faith, the Book of Revelation in the Holy Bible speaks of a supernaturally empowered leader, "the beast" or "Antichrist," ruling over the entire world for seven years, with the first half of his rule bringing a false yet overwhelmingly deceptive peace, and the last half bringing cataclysmic destruction and horrific violence throughout the globe. In order for the Antichrist to fulfill his destiny of world domination, a global imperial system must already be in place or at least be ripe for fruition. And with regards to other religions and cultures, there is the "doomsday prophecy" expected to occur on December 21, 2012, a date that is approximately three years from today. To date, the Biblical Antichrist has yet to assume absolute global power, let alone be made manifest. And according to the Bible, the height of his reign is to last for three and a half years, with the next three and a half years being filled with absolute global catastrophe. As such, the 2012 prophecies may not signify the absolute End of the World, but rather, the Beginning of the End, the Last Days, even the definitive death of American democracy, and ultimately, the imminent and uncontested rise of global imperialism.

Copyright © 2009, All Rights Reserved

"The Illusion that is the Middle-Class"

The world of money is governed by duality. You have the rich and the poor, leaders and followers, entrepreneurs and employees, landlords and tenants, upper-class and lower-class, and so on. Now by this time, someone having read the words above would have tried to correct them by saying that "upper-class and lower-class" do not count as a duality because of the existence of the middle-class, the third category. But the omission of the middle-class category was not a mistake at all. That is because, contrary to public opinion, the middle-class simply does not exist. In fact, the middle-class never existed at all. Now by this point, the same reader mentioned earlier might have laughed these words to scorn. Nevertheless, there is more than adequate proof to back up the claim that there never was a middle-class, nor could there have ever been a middle-class.

To begin with, a financial class (i.e. upper- and lower-class) contains two interrelated defining elements. One element is financial paradigm, and the other is lifestyle. Financial paradigm determines one’s overall view of money, cash-flow, income sources, assets, and so on. Lifestyle is simply how one lives, i.e. what they own, the luxuries they enjoy, their financial responsibilities, and so on. The lower-class paradigm consists of earned income (i.e. working for money, either for someone else or on your own), "climbing the corporate ladder" (which still implies earned income), working hard (i.e. like a horse with blinders), and only getting paid once for doing a job once. The upper-class paradigm, on the other hand, consists of passive income (i.e. money working for you, in the form of large assets you own, with those assets constantly generating millions of dollars for you every year regardless of your presence or absence), building and owning the corporate ladder that everyone else climbs (and that corporate ladder is your asset, generating passive income for you), working smart (i.e. working to learn, as opposed to working to earn; working to build your own assets as opposed to working for money), and getting paid continuously for doing the right job only once. As one can see, the financial paradigms of the lower-class and the upper-class are drastically different. With the lower-class paradigm, you are a slave of money. With the upper-class paradigm, you are the master of it. As such, the upper-class financial paradigm can afford a lifestyle millions of dollars greater than that of the lower-class financial paradigm. And because of paradigms, the respective capabilities to afford such lifestyles are ongoing.

Now for the problem of the so-called "middle-class." First of all, the average middle-class person works for money, vigorously climbs the corporate ladder, works very hard (especially in the process of climbing the corporate ladder), and only gets paid once for doing a job once. Sound familiar? Of course it does! This is exactly the financial paradigm of a lower-class person! But what truly adds insult to injury is that, unlike an intelligent lower-class person who chooses to live a lower-class lifestyle suited to his or her lower-class financial paradigm, the middle-class fool struggles to live a luxurious upper-class lifestyle using that same lower-class financial paradigm. This is why the average middle-class person is drowning in debts and financial disasters of all kinds, including credit card debts, automobile payments, ridiculously expensive leases, mortgages, repossessions, foreclosures, bankruptcies, collections, wage-garnishments, and numerous other types; in other words, he or she is a slave of money. This means that the middle-class is nothing more than a foolishly and outrageously extravagant version of the lower-class, which still makes them lower-class!

Until a person undergoes a true paradigm-shift, from the financial paradigm of the lower-class to that of the upper-class, he or she can only live the lifestyle suited for his or her paradigm, which in this case would be lower-class. People should stop trying to fool themselves with this senseless notion of a "middle-class," where you can achieve the reward of an upper-class lifestyle through the insular and menial responsibilities of a lower-class financial paradigm. Regardless of public opinion, the world of money is still governed by duality.

Copyright © 2009, All Rights Reserved

American Corporate Health-Insurance Slavery (Brought to You by "The Party of 'NO!'")

Well, they’ve done it again! The Republicans, the last bastion of heinous selfishness and corporate greed, have managed to pass a “NO” vote in the Senate against President Obama’s Health Care Public Option. (And these political miscreants have the utter nerve to wonder why they’ve been labeled “The Party of ‘NO!’”) The funny thing is, nobody ever bothered to get the vote of taxpayers like myself with regards to the Public Option. Here’s why I’d vote “YES.”

First of all, I have Blue Cross CaliforniaCare as my Health Insurer via COBRA. Or should I say “I had.” Since I’ve fallen on rather difficult times within the past few months, I simply haven’t had the US$372.00 in monthly premiums to keep the accursed thing going. I am quite certain the policy has lapsed by now, so I truly cannot afford to get sick. And because I’ve had two work-related injuries to my lower-back, I would definitely be insured at the Substandard Insured mark, which means I’d have to pay well over US$400.00 per month. This I know from a lady-friend of mine who recently had to be treated for breast cancer. Because business with her company slowed down significantly this year, her manager got rid of everyone’s insurance options, which means that she now has to get health insurance on her own in order to continue her chemotherapy treatments. Her job already doesn’t pay her enough (She barely gets enough financial aid to help raise her young daughter.), and because of her “existing condition,” the LEAST expensive company wants a whopping US$600.00 in monthly premiums. What is she supposed to do if she can’t come up with the money? Die??? Well, THAT’S PRETTY MUCH WHAT THE SENATE REPUBLICANS TOLD HER AND JUST ABOUT EVERY OTHER AMERICAN TAXPAYER IN HER CONDITION.

I don’t know about you, but I am getting tired of the Republicans, big businesses, and private insurance companies telling me what I can and cannot do with my taxpayer money. I already pay enough taxes as it is, and I’d like to see some of those taxes diverted to a Public Health Insurance Fund that both I and my friend with breast cancer can have access to in time of serious need. Numerous other nations like Canada, Britain, France, and neighboring European nations already have Public Health Insurance (and, in some cases, ONLY Public Health Insurance), and their health care is still comparable to ours. Why are we letting President Nixon’s legacy of Private Corporate Health Insurance continue to rob the nation blind???

ADDENDUM: It would truly be unfair of me to put all of the blame on the backs of Republicans. Quite a few Democrats, whose morals were basically purchased by bribe-money from the big medical insurance corporations, also killed the Public Option. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority who voted against the Option still consisted of, you guessed it, Republicans!

You Need to Get a Breast Reduction! (NOT!)

"You need to get a breast reduction!" If you are a woman who has extremely large breasts that have grown to dominate her entire torso, you may have heard these words more than once in your lifetime, and they may have left their imprint. You may have felt the need to address problems with back pain and other health issues. You may have felt the need to live a healthier lifestyle. You may have wished you could afford beautiful clothing that actually fits. You may have felt the desire to fit in with everyone else. Depending on the life you have led, those words may actually be carrying weight. That last statement about words carrying weight may sound like a pun, but there is far more reality to it than you think! Though your resulting circumstances may be physical in nature, they all started in one place, as words in your mind, words which were allowed to take root in your life over the years, eventually manifesting themselves as the physical problems you are currently facing. Still think the idea is too outrageous and far-fetched? Well, consider the following.

For every woman who has massive breasts and hates them, there are at least FIVE women who also have massive breasts and LOVE them. As a man, the author of this work knows this from experience, because he has actually dated those women over the decades, some of whom wore bras measuring 44KK, 48LL, and even 46R. If having massive breasts was such a bad thing, then every woman with big breasts would be getting a breast reduction. But that is not the case! Again, the difference between the women who love having massive breasts and the women who hate having them resides in their individual minds. A woman measuring 38DDD who has lived a life believing that her breasts were too monstrously big will go on to have breast reduction surgery of her own free will, while a woman measuring 50W who has lived a life believing that she was blessed with having such massive breasts will consider any doctor a complete fool for suggesting that she undergo breast reduction surgery.

Again, it all begins in the mind, not in the body! Without being consciously aware of it, a woman with big breasts will go through life enduring mistreatment from peers, "gentle" suggestions from "friends" that "maybe her breasts are just a tad too big," the increasing inability to find good-looking clothes that fit, and continual ostracism by the general public, either outwardly or covertly through media advertisements. One massive-breasted girlfriend the author was dating couldn't ride an amusement park ride because the restraint harness wasn't designed to fit over her massive bosom. That is basically size-discrimination against massive-breasted women, and it is wrong. Multiply such covert and overt acts of size-discrimination over the years, and the consequences are both far-reaching and psychologically devastating. It is not at all uncommon for chronic psychological problems to manifest themselves in the physical body of the victim. Women who have acquiesced to the years of size-discrimination also go on to develop orthopedic and hygiene problems that seem to be directly associated with their massive-breasts, but are really a product of their mind and the lifestyle created by that mind. Again, the author points out that the massive-breasted women he has dated absolutely loved their breasts, and subsequently had no such physical ailments. That is because a large-breasted woman who truly loves her breasts will instinctively take proper care of her large breasts without any kind of surgery, while a large-breasted woman who hates her breasts will instinctively do the exact opposite, and will then go on to get breast reduction surgery. A massive-breasted woman who truly loves her breasts will instinctively modify her lifestyle to fit her beautiful body, while a massive-breasted woman who hates her breasts will instinctively modify her already-beautiful body to fit her lifestyle.

Large-breasted women should never be made to feel ashamed for what they were born with. If that is what your "friends" are doing to you, then they are not your friends, plain and simple. American society, however, has been hardwired to thrive on rigid conformity, regardless of how innovative Americans claim to be. Women have to face this image of rigid conformity every waking day of their natural lives, in the form of how much the woman should weigh, what her ideal body shape should be, and even what kind of hair, eyes, and skin constitutes beauty. And women are constantly bombarded with this image through television, movies, magazines, news publications, artworks, song lyrics, the Internet, professional colleagues, co-workers, fellow students, close friends, and family. In other words, the average American woman never gets any rest from this constant societal bombardment. It originates with corporate American advertisement and trickles all the way down to the individual person's mind, every minute of the day, and every day of the year.

Why does corporate America perpetuate this image bombardment against women at large? They do it because it's good for the economy, the CORPORATION'S economy. They know that as long as American women are constantly spending money striving for SOMETHING THAT IS UNATTAINABLE FOR MORE THAN NINETY PERCENT OF AMERICA'S WOMEN, the corporations will continue to make BILLIONS of dollars every year in the diet, exercise, medical, and fashion industries. As such, women who have the "wrong" skin, hair, or eye shape or color, the "wrong" facial features, thighs that are "too large," a belly that is "too huge," a bubble-booty that is "too big," or breasts that are "too massive" are considered "outcasts" because they do not fit the image. This is how corporate America continues to generate its huge profits.

But if you ask some men on the street what kind of women they prefer, you'll hear a considerably different story. The author of this work absolutely enjoys women who have massive breasts that rival the remainder of their voluptuous torso in sheer size. And he is hardly alone. As a backlash against the corporate American image of feminine beauty, there are thousands of social groups on the Internet alone dedicated to size-acceptance, and especially to massive-breasted women and the men who admire them. In fact, most of these social groups have more male members than they have big-breasted female members. Such is usually the case when so many big-breasted women in America have been psychologically convinced over the years that their breasts are simply too big, and that they need to have breast reduction surgery. The author needs to get this message across to all massive-breasted women at large, day in, day out, year in, year out: "LOVE YOURSELVES JUST AS YOU ARE! THERE ARE PLENTY OF GUYS OUT THERE WHO LOVE YOU JUST AS YOU ARE! DON'T BELIEVE THE CORPORATE HYPE!"

Consider also these points: what did big-breasted women do with themselves BEFORE breast reduction surgery was invented? Apparently, they must have led productive lives, because they lived long enough to marry, bear children, and pass on the genetic trait for amazingly big breasts to their children, not just once, but for numerous generations, and even to this day. Understand that nature is a brutally efficient judge of what should be perpetuated and what should not be. If massive breasts were truly an unsuccessful thing, then massive-breasted women would not have been able to perpetuate their genes at all, and the trait would have died out long ago. As such, there would have been absolutely no massive-breasted women today. But to the contrary, massive-breasted women have not only thrived to this present day, but their breasts have also increased in size over the generations, indicating that overwhelmingly massive-breasted women are actually a tremendous genetic success-story.

Some closing words of wisdom: modify your lifestyle, not your body, and everything else will fall into place. Love yourself just as you are, and you'll have no problem finding someone who truly loves you just as you are.

Plug Up the Hole in the Bucket

For decades, even since the 1970s, the American economy has come to resemble a bucket with a hole in it. And for decades, we have been watching the dollars trickle out of this hole. Where do these leaking dollars wind up? Invested in other economies throughout the world, that's where, which really doesn't do us much good here. Every time we purchased a foreign product, more money leaked out of the hole. Every time businesses and retail stores purchased foreign bulk items to sell in their outlets, more money leaked out of the hole. Every time another business chose to offshore yet another myriad of jobs, more money leaked out of the hole. Every time money was sent to families outside of this country, more money leaked out of the hole. In short, every time the dollar leaves this country instead of circulating within the American economy, more money leaks out of the hole, and more money leaks out of the hole, and more money leaks out of the hole, until the bucket eventually becomes bone-dry. Which pretty much sums up the state of our economy today. I am not surprised that yet another 600,000 jobs were erased in just one day. And although I am aware that President Obama and the rest of Washington are doing the best they can to deal with the problem, they desperately need to do something else before they can even think of sinking another eight-hundred-billion dollars of OUR money into this economy. It would only make sense to plug up the hole in the bucket before trying to fill it with water again. Otherwise, I don't care if Obama sinks eight-hundred-TRILLION dollars into this economy: it will only wind up being converted into yet another Euro, Yen, or some other foreign currency somewhere else.

Happy (Belated) New Year (with My New House Music)

This new year has already been a roller-coaster ride, albeit an exciting and promising one. History was definitely made when Barack Obama, the first African-American President, was sworn into office. And yep, I got the whole thing on DVD! ;)

That being said, I've had several promises I have yet to keep. Since I have been composing Electronic Dance and House music for eons, and have yet to get any DJs to preview it, I've also decided to start putting the word out there that I'm a composer looking for DJs to preview my work. So here goes: I'm a composer looking for DJs to preview my work.


I've also attached two low-resolution examples of my work to this post (below), so you can see what my stuff sounds like.